MR. COLWELL: Well, I'll talk about that in a second. But the Irvings came on the radio and said, we're only going to have 1,200 - that's 1,200 new jobs in our facility, not 11,000, not 11,000 - 1,200, that's the real number from the people who got this contract, not this government that's going through this crap. When you go (Interruptions)

AN HON. MEMBER: That's unparliamentary.

MR. COLWELL: Oh, that's awful, isn't it? We've got this five-year plan, this five-year highway plan . . .

HON. ROSS LANDRY: Let him have his say, be a man about it. (Interruptions)

MADAM SPEAKER: Order, please. I'm going to rule that one unparliamentary. I would ask that the member retract that statement.

The honourable Minister of Justice.

HON. ROSS LANDRY: I was wrong in my remark. I withdraw my remark.

Before we go to the next notice of motion, I realized that the honourable member for Inverness had an attachment with this resolution which is out of order. However, if the House gives unanimous consent this one time I will accept it.

Would all those in favour of the motion please say Aye. Contrary minded, Nay.

The motion is carried.

MR. YOUNGER: Mr. Speaker, well I'm not sure the Premier has seen the ads then because that's not what they advertise at all. They advertise government plans for things that may happen in the future. The hypocrisy of this crowd knows no bounds. When in Opposition, they . . .

MR. SPEAKER: Order. Order. That word is unparliamentary.

MR. YOUNGER: I'll withdraw it.

HON. MICHEL SAMSON: Mr. Speaker, on a point of order. Quite often during debate in this House, either during Question Period or elsewhere, sometimes members may get a bit excited and use language which is clearly not only unparliamentary but goes beyond the bounds of decency.

SPEAKER'S RULING: Photograph taken from Gallery (Pt. of order by Hon. M. Samson [Hansard p. 567, 04/12/11])

On Tuesday, April 12th, the member for Richmond rose on what he described as a point of order, or possibly, he said, a point of privilege, as it went to the Rules of this House. It is a point of order as it deals with the rules and usages of the House, but it does approach the area of privilege known as contempt.